<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mylensdb.com/sigma-17-70mm-f28-4-dc-macro-os-hsm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/sigma-17-70mm-f28-4-dc-macro-os-hsm/</link>
	<description>Malaysia camera lens database, price watch and sample photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/sigma-17-70mm-f28-4-dc-macro-os-hsm/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 08:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylensdb.com/?p=1074#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t really comment on your question here as I have not tried out the
 Sigma myself before and only had a couple of brief moments with the 
Canon 18-135mm. 

From what I have read around, you would be better 
equipped in low light compared to the Canon due to its larger aperture (f/2.8). The Sigma has also larger magnification (1:2.7 as opposed to 1:5) which may suit your needs better too.

But if you are into landscape photography, I would suggest you to look into lenses like the Canon EF-S 10-22mm too. I owned one before and often I used it back as by normal zoom lens as well as it covers the typical normal 17-22mm range (although it is still quite limited to be used as a normal zoom lens, typically 18-55mm)

Hope it helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really comment on your question here as I have not tried out the<br />
 Sigma myself before and only had a couple of brief moments with the<br />
Canon 18-135mm. </p>
<p>From what I have read around, you would be better<br />
equipped in low light compared to the Canon due to its larger aperture (f/2.8). The Sigma has also larger magnification (1:2.7 as opposed to 1:5) which may suit your needs better too.</p>
<p>But if you are into landscape photography, I would suggest you to look into lenses like the Canon EF-S 10-22mm too. I owned one before and often I used it back as by normal zoom lens as well as it covers the typical normal 17-22mm range (although it is still quite limited to be used as a normal zoom lens, typically 18-55mm)</p>
<p>Hope it helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/sigma-17-70mm-f28-4-dc-macro-os-hsm/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylensdb.com/?p=1074#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Hi,I&#039;m planning on buying a Canon 600D body only with this Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM instead of the 600D 18-135mm kit. I&#039;m more into landscape and macro photography with a tight budget of S$2000.With lens is better Sigma or Canon in term of image quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I&#8217;m planning on buying a Canon 600D body only with this Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM instead of the 600D 18-135mm kit. I&#8217;m more into landscape and macro photography with a tight budget of S$2000.With lens is better Sigma or Canon in term of image quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/sigma-17-70mm-f28-4-dc-macro-os-hsm/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylensdb.com/?p=1074#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Sharing!

Some discussion found online for this lens compared some other similar lenses like the Tamron 17-50 and Nikon 16-85.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=799955
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1034&amp;message=37979529&amp;changemode=1
http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond90club/discuss/72157623451866706/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharing!</p>
<p>Some discussion found online for this lens compared some other similar lenses like the Tamron 17-50 and Nikon 16-85.</p>
<p><a href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=799955" rel="nofollow">http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=799955</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1034&#038;message=37979529&#038;changemode=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1034&#038;message=37979529&#038;changemode=1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond90club/discuss/72157623451866706/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond90club/discuss/72157623451866706/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/19 queries in 0.106 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.mylensdb.com @ 2012-02-10 18:47:51 -->
