<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tokina AT-X 165 16-50mm f/2.8 AF PRO DX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mylensdb.com/tokina-at-x-165-16-50mm-f2-8-af-pro-dx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/tokina-at-x-165-16-50mm-f2-8-af-pro-dx/</link>
	<description>Malaysia camera lens database, price watch and sample photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/tokina-at-x-165-16-50mm-f2-8-af-pro-dx/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylensdb.com/?p=684#comment-68</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-67&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hi Ray&lt;/a&gt;, thanks a lot for your comment here. We really appreciate your contribution here. We hope that you find our project interesting and useful. 

&quot;I would like to see Photos that have not had such extensive enhancements such as these to get a real feel of the Tokina before buying it.&quot;

on your statements above, our scripts crawl photos by itself but there are mostly verified by us before a photo will be made public here. Generally, and technically (as for now), it&#039;s not too possible to tell if a photo that has been processed heavily with post-processing tools (yet). This is one very good suggestion and we will keep a note on that. 

Thanks again for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-67" rel="nofollow">Hi Ray</a>, thanks a lot for your comment here. We really appreciate your contribution here. We hope that you find our project interesting and useful. </p>
<p>&#8220;I would like to see Photos that have not had such extensive enhancements such as these to get a real feel of the Tokina before buying it.&#8221;</p>
<p>on your statements above, our scripts crawl photos by itself but there are mostly verified by us before a photo will be made public here. Generally, and technically (as for now), it&#8217;s not too possible to tell if a photo that has been processed heavily with post-processing tools (yet). This is one very good suggestion and we will keep a note on that. </p>
<p>Thanks again for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.mylensdb.com/tokina-at-x-165-16-50mm-f2-8-af-pro-dx/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylensdb.com/?p=684#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I recently bought a 12 - 24 mm F4.0 Tokina. Silidly build alright. There is so much hype about the so called sharpness of this Lens. I am yet to find out for sure and test this Lens myself further. I compared it to the Tamron 17 - 50 mm F2.8. Had exactly the same settings and focal distance set on both for 17 mm. The tamron beats it hands down on over all sharpness right across it&#039;s pane. I am used to the quality of Tamron and expected Tokina to be at least as equal.  I have a Tamron 70 - 200 mm that needs repairs. I am contemplating on purchasing the Tokina 50 - 135 F2.8 ATX Pro but I am not so sure now. What if this Lens does not come at least to paar with my current 70 - 200 Tammy? I would like to see Photos that have not had such extensive enhancements such as these to get a real feel of the Tokina before buying it. Guess the hype People made about the Tokina just never had a better performing Tamron, even though tamrons are a little fragile and can break more easily. 
TOKINA? Not convinced  yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought a 12 &#8211; 24 mm F4.0 Tokina. Silidly build alright. There is so much hype about the so called sharpness of this Lens. I am yet to find out for sure and test this Lens myself further. I compared it to the Tamron 17 &#8211; 50 mm F2.8. Had exactly the same settings and focal distance set on both for 17 mm. The tamron beats it hands down on over all sharpness right across it&#8217;s pane. I am used to the quality of Tamron and expected Tokina to be at least as equal.  I have a Tamron 70 &#8211; 200 mm that needs repairs. I am contemplating on purchasing the Tokina 50 &#8211; 135 F2.8 ATX Pro but I am not so sure now. What if this Lens does not come at least to paar with my current 70 &#8211; 200 Tammy? I would like to see Photos that have not had such extensive enhancements such as these to get a real feel of the Tokina before buying it. Guess the hype People made about the Tokina just never had a better performing Tamron, even though tamrons are a little fragile and can break more easily.<br />
TOKINA? Not convinced  yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.mylensdb.com @ 2012-02-11 09:31:20 -->
